Thermal Conductivity converter
How readily a material carries heat, the k-value behind insulation and heat-exchanger calculations.
Converter
Quick pairs
tap to loadOne watt per meter per kelvin in every thermal conductivity unit
7 rows| Unit | Symbol | 1 W/(m·K) equals |
|---|---|---|
| Watt per centimeter per °C | W/(cm·°C) | 0.01 |
| Kilowatt per meter per kelvin | kW/(m·K) | 0.001 |
| Milliwatt per meter per kelvin | mW/(m·K) | 1,000 |
| Calorie per second per centimeter per °C | cal/(s·cm·°C) | 0.002390057361 |
| Kilocalorie per hour per meter per °C | kcal/(h·m·°C) | 0.8604206501 |
| BTU per hour per foot per °F | BTU/(h·ft·°F) | 0.5777893165 |
| BTU inch per hour per square foot per °F | BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) | 6.933471799 |
How the watt per meter per kelvin to btu per hour per foot per °f conversion works
Thermal conductivity (often written k) describes how readily a material conducts heat through its bulk, referenced here to watt per meter per kelvin. Watt per centimeter per °C is 100 times larger per unit, since it packs the same wattage into a shorter centimeter span. Kilowatt and milliwatt per meter per kelvin are straightforward metric scalings (×1000 and ×0.001). The calorie- and BTU-based units are holdovers from older engineering and food-science literature: calorie per second per centimeter per °C runs at 418.4, and BTU per hour per foot per °F at roughly 1.731, reflecting the very different base units each system starts from.
The highlighted conversion is watt per meter per kelvin to BTU per hour per foot per °F: BTU/(h·ft·°F) = W/(m·K) × 0.5777893165. Reverse it by multiplying by 1.730734666.
Copper, a benchmark conductor at roughly 401 W/(m·K), converts to 401 × 0.5777893165 ≈ 231.69 BTU/(h·ft·°F). Typical fiberglass insulation, at about 0.04 W/(m·K), converts to 0.04 × 0.5777893165 ≈ 0.0231 BTU/(h·ft·°F) — a roughly 10,000-fold gap that illustrates why metals need heatsinks and insulation needs almost none.
Thermal conductivity drives decisions across very different fields: architects and energy modelers use it to size wall and roof insulation, electronics engineers use it to choose heat-spreader materials (copper, aluminum, or more exotic graphite composites) for chips and LEDs, and cookware manufacturers pick conductive bases (copper, aluminum) for even heating. Heat-exchanger and furnace designers rely on published k-values to size equipment that has to move large amounts of heat through a given wall thickness.
A frequent mix-up is confusing thermal conductivity (k, a material property independent of thickness) with thermal conductance or the related R-value, which depend on how thick the material actually is. The BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) unit in this category already bakes in a 1-inch thickness assumption, which is convenient for insulation board ratings but produces a different-looking number than plain k — doubling the board thickness halves its conductance even though the material's underlying k value hasn't changed at all.
Questions
How many BTU per hour per foot per °F equal one watt per meter per kelvin?
One W/(m·K) equals 0.5777893165 BTU/(h·ft·°F). This is one of the most frequently looked-up conversions when comparing US and metric insulation or metal datasheets.
Which units does this thermal conductivity converter cover?
8 units referenced to watt per meter per kelvin: W/(m·K), W/(cm·°C), kW/(m·K), mW/(m·K), cal/(s·cm·°C), kcal/(h·m·°C), BTU/(h·ft·°F), and BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F).
How precise are thermal conductivity conversions?
The conversion factors themselves are exact, but real-world k-values vary with temperature, moisture content, and manufacturing batch, so published material figures are typically only reliable to 2-3 significant figures — more decimal places in the converted result than that are not physically meaningful.
When would I use BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) instead of plain W/(m·K)?
BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) is the standard rating for insulation boards in US construction, since it directly reflects a 1-inch-thick panel's performance; plain W/(m·K) is the underlying material property used in scientific and international engineering contexts regardless of thickness.
Is a higher thermal conductivity always worse for insulation?
Yes for insulation purposes — a lower k-value (like fiberglass's ~0.04 W/(m·K)) means slower heat flow and better insulating performance, while a high k-value (like copper's ~401 W/(m·K)) is exactly what you want in a heat spreader or cooking pan base, so whether a value is good depends entirely on the application.
More on precision and what leaves your device: see About and Privacy policy.