UnitSnap All converters

Thermal Conductivity converter

How readily a material carries heat, the k-value behind insulation and heat-exchanger calculations.

8 units, referenced to the watt per meter per kelvin

Converter

-
Decimals, fractions such as 3/4, and scientific notation such as 1.2e3 all work.

Quick pairs

tap to load

One watt per meter per kelvin in every thermal conductivity unit

7 rows
UnitSymbol1 W/(m·K) equals
Watt per centimeter per °CW/(cm·°C)0.01
Kilowatt per meter per kelvinkW/(m·K)0.001
Milliwatt per meter per kelvinmW/(m·K)1,000
Calorie per second per centimeter per °Ccal/(s·cm·°C)0.002390057361
Kilocalorie per hour per meter per °Ckcal/(h·m·°C)0.8604206501
BTU per hour per foot per °FBTU/(h·ft·°F)0.5777893165
BTU inch per hour per square foot per °FBTU·in/(h·ft²·°F)6.933471799

How the watt per meter per kelvin to btu per hour per foot per °f conversion works

Thermal conductivity (often written k) describes how readily a material conducts heat through its bulk, referenced here to watt per meter per kelvin. Watt per centimeter per °C is 100 times larger per unit, since it packs the same wattage into a shorter centimeter span. Kilowatt and milliwatt per meter per kelvin are straightforward metric scalings (×1000 and ×0.001). The calorie- and BTU-based units are holdovers from older engineering and food-science literature: calorie per second per centimeter per °C runs at 418.4, and BTU per hour per foot per °F at roughly 1.731, reflecting the very different base units each system starts from.

The highlighted conversion is watt per meter per kelvin to BTU per hour per foot per °F: BTU/(h·ft·°F) = W/(m·K) × 0.5777893165. Reverse it by multiplying by 1.730734666.

Copper, a benchmark conductor at roughly 401 W/(m·K), converts to 401 × 0.5777893165 ≈ 231.69 BTU/(h·ft·°F). Typical fiberglass insulation, at about 0.04 W/(m·K), converts to 0.04 × 0.5777893165 ≈ 0.0231 BTU/(h·ft·°F) — a roughly 10,000-fold gap that illustrates why metals need heatsinks and insulation needs almost none.

Thermal conductivity drives decisions across very different fields: architects and energy modelers use it to size wall and roof insulation, electronics engineers use it to choose heat-spreader materials (copper, aluminum, or more exotic graphite composites) for chips and LEDs, and cookware manufacturers pick conductive bases (copper, aluminum) for even heating. Heat-exchanger and furnace designers rely on published k-values to size equipment that has to move large amounts of heat through a given wall thickness.

A frequent mix-up is confusing thermal conductivity (k, a material property independent of thickness) with thermal conductance or the related R-value, which depend on how thick the material actually is. The BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) unit in this category already bakes in a 1-inch thickness assumption, which is convenient for insulation board ratings but produces a different-looking number than plain k — doubling the board thickness halves its conductance even though the material's underlying k value hasn't changed at all.

Questions

How many BTU per hour per foot per °F equal one watt per meter per kelvin?

One W/(m·K) equals 0.5777893165 BTU/(h·ft·°F). This is one of the most frequently looked-up conversions when comparing US and metric insulation or metal datasheets.

Which units does this thermal conductivity converter cover?

8 units referenced to watt per meter per kelvin: W/(m·K), W/(cm·°C), kW/(m·K), mW/(m·K), cal/(s·cm·°C), kcal/(h·m·°C), BTU/(h·ft·°F), and BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F).

How precise are thermal conductivity conversions?

The conversion factors themselves are exact, but real-world k-values vary with temperature, moisture content, and manufacturing batch, so published material figures are typically only reliable to 2-3 significant figures — more decimal places in the converted result than that are not physically meaningful.

When would I use BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) instead of plain W/(m·K)?

BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F) is the standard rating for insulation boards in US construction, since it directly reflects a 1-inch-thick panel's performance; plain W/(m·K) is the underlying material property used in scientific and international engineering contexts regardless of thickness.

Is a higher thermal conductivity always worse for insulation?

Yes for insulation purposes — a lower k-value (like fiberglass's ~0.04 W/(m·K)) means slower heat flow and better insulating performance, while a high k-value (like copper's ~401 W/(m·K)) is exactly what you want in a heat spreader or cooking pan base, so whether a value is good depends entirely on the application.

More on precision and what leaves your device: see About and Privacy policy.